Replying to Topic 'Why not to do the throttle body coolant bypass'
I would suspect that the reason your car ran faster when cool is due to coolant and inlet air temps. Many modern engine ECUs rely heavily on coolant temps when they select fuel and timing maps. Hondas are especially sensitive to this. When the car is running hot, the ECU retards timing and richens the mixture. This is because hot spots on engine sleeves can cause preignition. Also IATs play a major role. ECUs will advance timing with cooler air, yielding more horsepower. Hot inlet air tends to detonate more easily than cold air. This is the second benefit to a cold air intake (the first being the higher oxygen content of the cooler air).
Let's see how significant my 0.25 horsepower gain is. Let us also use a 'horsepower calculator' to help:
http://javascript.internet.com/calculators...horsepower.html
If I have a Mazda6s at 3400 lbs (159lb driver) from:
http://www.mazdausa.com/MusaWeb/displayPag...vehicleCode=MZ6
and I pull a 16.07 second 1/4 mile from:
http://autos.msn.com/research/vip/spec_eng...VIP&tab=2&sub=1
I have 210.51 hp at the flywheel, close to 220hp. Now, if I modify my quarter mile times that will reflect a 0.25 hp gain, I arrive at a 16.0635 second quarter mile, or a gain of 0.0065 seconds. I know that this is not a very scientific method but 1/4 mile times have to be the worst judge of minor performance gains. Humans cannot even sign their name the same way twice, much less launch, shift and steer the car the same way down a 1320ft long track more than once. Let's not even go into environmental factors!
Heat IS the enemy when it comes to drag racing, but I still would not bypass the coolant in my throttle body or worry about heat transfer through my inlet piping or manifold. From my earlier post, our inlet air is moving at 88ft/s. In a three foot long section of pipe, each molecule of air is only in there for 3/10 of a second. Hardly enough time to heat up significantly. If you have ever passed your hand through the flame of a candle (2000F), you know how important time is to heat transfer (well, maybe not if you burned yourself).
I would suspect that the reason your car ran faster when cool is due to coolant and inlet air temps. Many modern engine ECUs rely heavily on coolant temps when they select fuel and timing maps. Hondas are especially sensitive to this. When the car is running hot, the ECU retards timing and richens the mixture. This is because hot spots on engine sleeves can cause preignition. Also IATs play a major role. ECUs will advance timing with cooler air, yielding more horsepower. Hot inlet air tends to detonate more easily than cold air. This is the second benefit to a cold air intake (the first being the higher oxygen content of the cooler air).
Let's see how significant my 0.25 horsepower gain is. Let us also use a 'horsepower calculator' to help:
http://javascript.internet.com/calculators...horsepower.html
If I have a Mazda6s at 3400 lbs (159lb driver) from:
http://www.mazdausa.com/MusaWeb/displayPag...vehicleCode=MZ6
and I pull a 16.07 second 1/4 mile from:
http://autos.msn.com/research/vip/spec_eng...VIP&tab=2&sub=1
I have 210.51 hp at the flywheel, close to 220hp. Now, if I modify my quarter mile times that will reflect a 0.25 hp gain, I arrive at a 16.0635 second quarter mile, or a gain of 0.0065 seconds. I know that this is not a very scientific method but 1/4 mile times have to be the worst judge of minor performance gains. Humans cannot even sign their name the same way twice, much less launch, shift and steer the car the same way down a 1320ft long track more than once. Let's not even go into environmental factors!