[bani]

full time AWD FTW. haldex FTL.

 

[bani]

Real-world does it matter? I don't think so, especially if the sensor/software system is good with a Haldex-like system, which I think the MS6 has. Maybe track driving at 10/10s it might appear.
[/b]

i dont like the computer controlled AWD, since the car's driving characteristics change seemingly almost randomly from FWD to AWD. it happens at annoying times too. i'd rather have it FWD all the time or AWD all the time so you aren't caught off guard when it suddenly switches.

you dont have to drive it 10/10s to notice. 5/10s will do nicely.

 

[bani]

see post number 17...
[/b]

you dont want a lecture, but you obviously do need one.

 

[bani]

Wow, some MS6 folks are really touchy when it comes to the AWD system used, hehe.

Cmon, putting out the statement about the "same" torque split ability as the Evo, you must have known you were gonna get the replies you got.[/b]

yep. the MS6 ain't no evo. not by a long shot. wonder why people here insist on comparing the MS6 to a rally car... apparently they keep thinking their MS6 is something it isn't.

 

[bani]

if anything is a "scam" it's haldex, not sh-awd.

 

[bani]

The demonstration targets a weakness in the AWD system in an artifical scenario that will probably never happen in real life. Thus the beauty in marketing.[/b]

yep agree 100% it was a contrived "test". i love salesdroids.

 

[bani]

please close the thread, it's just troll city in here.