Joined
·
2,972 Posts
Read a reivew of the M6 2.3l from Swedish tv-program Trafikmagasinet (the founders of the famous Elk Test!!). They liked it very much. It got five of five "Steering Wheels" in Technologie for example. The only cons they really had was that the road noise and the price of the spair parts. And that they felt that the rear was a little "claustrophobic" or confiend.. don't really know the exakt word.. Not that bad really. They just thought the rear windows (Sedan) was a little small.. A minor thing.
Anyway.. .the point of this post - they messured the cars performance a little. 0-100km/h i 9 seconds. Might sound bad but they way they test cars are the most "gentle" way. Almost a normal launch, then the pedal to the metal.. Not high rpm drops or anything like that.
100km/h - 0km/h was done in 38 meteres. Very good.
Then they had tested the car at Rototest - a Swedish company speicalzed in that... They messured 154hp on the wheels! Pretty good. Just a 12 hp loss from the engine. Emission levels are fine as well 95 "points" compared to their average car @100. They said it was good for such a big eninge.
Milage was a little bad though, in my view. It was messured on a dyno to 0.94l/mil (swedish term for 10km). Thats 9.4l/100km.
Anyway.. .the point of this post - they messured the cars performance a little. 0-100km/h i 9 seconds. Might sound bad but they way they test cars are the most "gentle" way. Almost a normal launch, then the pedal to the metal.. Not high rpm drops or anything like that.
100km/h - 0km/h was done in 38 meteres. Very good.
Then they had tested the car at Rototest - a Swedish company speicalzed in that... They messured 154hp on the wheels! Pretty good. Just a 12 hp loss from the engine. Emission levels are fine as well 95 "points" compared to their average car @100. They said it was good for such a big eninge.
Milage was a little bad though, in my view. It was messured on a dyno to 0.94l/mil (swedish term for 10km). Thats 9.4l/100km.